Why Jesus Apologetics

16 They are not of the world, just as I am not of the world.  17 Sanctify them by the truth; Your word is truth.

John 17:16-17 (BSB)

At Why Jesus Apologetics, we’re tackling alleged Bible contradictions to strengthen believers’ confidence and address skeptics’ challenges. A frequently cited issue is the differing number of fighting men in Israel and Judah during David’s census, as reported in 2 Samuel 24:9 and 1 Chronicles 21:5. Critics claim these discrepancies undermine Scripture’s reliability.

In our previous post, we addressed the alleged contradiction regarding the number of fighting men in Israel by comparing 2 Samuel 24:9 and 1 Chronicles 21:5. As we noted, these two passages contain two separate numerical discrepancies that critics often cite as contradictions. Having already resolved the issue concerning Israel’s count, this blog post now focuses on the second question. Although it may appear simple at first glance, it is actually more technical than the first one we addressed.
Sit back, read carefully, and enjoy the solution.

The Passages in Question

The texts at the heart of this alleged contradiction are:

“And Joab gave up the sum of the number of the people unto the king: and there were in Israel eight hundred thousand valiant men that drew the sword; and the men of Judah were five hundred thousand men.”

– 2 Samuel 24:9 (KJV)

“And Joab gave the sum of the number of the people unto David. And all they of Israel were a thousand thousand and an hundred thousand men that drew sword, and Judah was four hundred threescore and ten thousand men that drew sword.”

– 1 Chronicles 21:5 (KJV)

The Problem

1. The number of the People of Judah according to 2 Samuel (2 Samuel 24:9) is 500,000 persons.
2. But according to 1 Chronicles (1 Chronicles 21:5), it is 470,000 persons.
3. The difference between the two numbers is:

500,000- 470,000 = 30,000 men.

The question posed by critics is, how many fighting men were found in Judah? They said, we must account for the 30,000-man difference in Judah’s count (500,000 vs. 470,000), or else the seemingly contradictory allegation stands.

In this post, we will directly address the critics’ claim. By examining the context, biblical languages, and hermeneutical principles, we will demonstrate how these figures can be harmonized.

The Solution

Let’s read:

“…and the men of Judah were five hundred thousand men.”– 2 Samuel 24:9 (KJV)

Versus

“…and Judah was four hundred threescore and ten thousand men that drew sword.” – 1 Chronicles 21:5 (KJV)

Now, let’s examine this more closely.

a. Applying the Law of Non-Contradiction

To determine whether these two passages are truly contradictory, we must apply the Law of Non-Contradiction, a fundamental principle of logic. In classical logic, the law of non-contradiction states:

“A thing cannot be both A and not-A at the same time and in the same respect.”

This is a foundational law of rationality and logic. If something violates this principle, it is logically incoherent or self-refuting. Geisler states:

“A contradiction occurs only when two statements assert opposing claims about the same subject, in the same sense, at the same time.”
(Geisler, Systematic Theology, Vol. 1, Bethany House, 2002, p. 118).

For a real contradiction to exist, three conditions must be met:

1. The statements must refer to the same thing,
2. They must speak of it at the same time, and
3. They must speak of it in the same sense.

Now let’s evaluate the two texts:

• 2 Samuel 24:9 reports that 500,000 men were found in Judah.
• 1 Chronicles 21:5 reports that 470,000 men who drew the sword were counted in Judah.

A closer look shows that these passages fail to meet the criteria for a true contradiction.

First, the two accounts are not referring to the exact same group.

2 Samuel likely gives a total number of troops, possibly including those who served in non-combat roles, such as reserves, administrative personnel, or troops using weapons other than swords.

On the other hand, 1 Chronicles specifically mentions “those who drew the sword”, clearly referring to a subset of the army, namely, those trained and equipped for sword combat. Therefore, they are not speaking about the same category of soldiers.

Second, while both texts refer to the same historical event i.e., David’s census, they do not describe it in the same sense. One gives a broad figure; the other gives a more narrow one. This difference in scope means the third condition of the Law of Non-Contradiction is not fulfilled.

In conclusion, because the numbers in 2 Samuel and 1 Chronicles are not referring to the same group of people in the same sense, these verses do not contradict each other. Instead, they reflect different emphases and legitimate variation in reporting, just as we often see in historical, military, and even modern records.

Therefore, when judged by the standard of logical consistency, the Bible stands firm.

N-O – B-I-B-L-E – C-O-N-T-R-A-D-I-C-T-I-O-N

b. How One Word Makes the Difference

Let’s carefully compare the Hebrew texts of 2 Samuel 24:9 and 1 Chronicles 21:5, focusing specifically on the Hebrew words to see how they differ. Although the difference in wording is slightly subtler than in the Israel case, it is still meaningful and worth pointing out.

In the two records, a key word in 1 Chronicles 21:5 provides a crucial qualifier that is *absent in 2 Samuel 24:9. This one word helps clarify why Chronicles reports 470,000 men for Judah while Samuel reports 500,000.

2 Samuel 24:9 (Hebrew + Transliteration) – Without Qualifier

Hebrew

וְאִישׁ יְהוּדָה חֲמֵשׁ מֵאוֹת אֶלֶף אִישׁ

Ve-ish Yehudah chamesh me’ot elef ish

Key Observation:

“וְאִישׁ יְהוּדָה חֲמֵשׁ מֵאוֹת אֶלֶף אִישׁ”
“And the men of Judah were five hundred thousand men.”
Note: This verse gives a total number without any qualifier about weaponry or combat role. No further description is given, just a total number.

1 Chronicles 21:5 (Hebrew + Transliteration) – With Qualifier

Hebrew:

וִיהוּדָה אַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת וְשִׁבְעִים אֶלֶף אִישׁ שֹׁלֵף חָרֶב

V’Yehudah arba me’ot ve’shiv’im elef ish sholef cherev

Key Observation:

“וִיהוּדָה אַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת וְשִׁבְעִים אֶלֶף אִישׁ שֹׁלֵף חָרֶב”
“And Judah was four hundred and seventy thousand men who drew the sword.”
Highlighted Phrase: שֹׁלֵף חָרֶב (sholef cherev) — “who drew the sword”

This phrase (“who drew the sword”) is the key qualifier, specifying that only sword-bearing combatants were counted in this figure.

Why This Is Important?

In 2 Samuel, the number appears to refer to all military-registered men in Judah, possibly including support troops, reserves, or those assigned elsewhere (to be proven later).

In 1 Chronicles, the number is restricted to those “who drew the sword” that is, those in active combat roles. This phrase (“who drew the sword”) is the key qualifier, specifying that only sword-bearing combatants were counted in this figure.

Just like in the case of Israel’s count, one Hebrew phrase makes the difference. It shows that the discrepancy is not a contradiction, but a difference in scope and reporting style. Chronicles narrows the focus; Samuel gives the broad total. When properly interpreted, the text remains logically consistent and historically credible.

Still – N-O – B-I-B-L-E – C-O-N-T-R-A-D-I-C-T-I-O-N

c. Do We Need to Account for the Difference of 30,000?

We don’t think so, and here is why:

The internal clues within 1 Chronicles 21:6 explicitly state that Joab did not complete the count in certain areas due to the king’s sinful command. This clearly affected the completeness or categorization of Judah’s figures:

“But he did not include Levi and Benjamin in the numbering, for the king’s command was abhorrent to Joab.”
(1 Chronicles 21:6, ESV)

This admission implies that the figures in Chronicles may reflect an incomplete or more selective report, likely more precise in specifying only those “who drew the sword.”

Let’s examine the immediate context:

5 And Joab gave the sum of the numbering of the people to David. In all Israel there were 1,100,000 men who drew the sword, and in Judah 470,000 who drew the sword.

6 But he did not include Levi and Benjamin in the numbering, for the king’s command was abhorrent to Joab.

While verse 6 specifically mentions Levi and Benjamin, it still shows that the census process was disrupted and selectively executed. If parts of southern tribes (possibly in Judah’s territory) were also omitted or affected due to Joab’s displeasure, this may explain the discrepancy in Judah’s count between 2 Samuel and 1 Chronicles.

On the other hand, 2 Samuel 24:9 does not specify that only combat-ready men were counted in Judah. It simply gives a round number:

“…and the men of Judah were five hundred thousand.”
(2 Samuel 24:9, ESV)

This likely refers to a general total, possibly including all able-bodied men of military age, regardless of whether they were currently enlisted or classified as active soldiers.

If We Must Account for the 30,000 Difference

A consistent and logical explanation is this:

• Chronicles (470,000) refers specifically to men “who drew the sword”—active-duty combatants.
• Samuel (500,000) likely represents the total military-age males, including 30,000 additional men who were eligible but not currently enlisted (i.e., inactive or reserve forces).

This distinction explains the numerical difference without contradiction. Rather than being an error, the difference stems from each book’s reporting purpose and level of specificity:

• Chronicles emphasizes military readiness, consistent with its Levitical interest in precision, roles, and temple-based order.
• Samuel presents a broader political and administrative overview, focusing less on military status.

What About the “30,000 Chosen Men” Theory?

Some have attempted to explain the discrepancy by referencing 2 Samuel 6:1, where David gathered 30,000 chosen men to bring the Ark to Jerusalem. The theory is that these men might have been omitted from one record because they weren’t considered combatants.

However, this explanation is weak for several reasons:

1. The theory present Chronological gap because the event in 2 Samuel 6:1 occurred long before the census.
2. There is no textual link indicating that these 30,000 men are connected to the census event.
3. The Bible does not distinguish troops that way within these accounts i.e. no active vs. inactive division in the text

Such a theory reads too much into the text and invents unnecessary complications. These minor variations do not represent contradictions. They are easily explainable by:

• Incomplete data (1 Chronicles 21:6)
• Variations in classification (combatants vs. total eligible males)
• Different theological and historical purposes (Samuel = earlier monarchic focus; Chronicles = post-exilic priestly precision)

Thus, there is no need to force a connection between 2 Samuel 6:1 and the census. The 30,000 difference in Judah’s number is more naturally explained by categorical distinctions—those who drew the sword versus total eligible men.

Analogy to Help Understand

The School Sports Trial – Explaining the 30,000 Difference

Imagine a large school is preparing for an inter-school sports competition. The principal wants to know how many students in the school are eligible, while the sports coordinator (like Joab) is tasked with doing the actual assessment.

There are twelve classes, each representing a tribe of Israel. The goal is to count how many students are ready and fit to participate in battle-like sports activities.

First Report: General Count from the Principal’s Office (Like 2 Samuel 24:9)

The principal receives a report from the administrative staff:

“Sir, in total, we have 500 students from the junior school (Judah) and 800 students from the senior school (Israel). That makes 1,300 students overall.”

This report is general. It does not mention who is fully trained, or whether some students missed the evaluation. It just gives a broad count, based on records, estimates, or preliminary figures.

Second Report: Sports Coordinator’s Report (Like 1 Chronicles 21:5–6)

Now the sports coordinator, who actually interacted with the students and did a ground-level assessment, presents his report:

“Sir, we have 1,100 senior students who are actually trained and ready to compete, and 470 juniors who have passed the readiness tests.”

But he adds a note:

“We couldn’t evaluate students from two classes—the art class (Levi) and the music class (Benjamin). The instruction to evaluate everyone made me uneasy, so I stopped short of completing it.”

Understanding the 30-Student Difference

Now someone notices:

“Wait—why does the principal’s report say 500 juniors, but the coordinator says 470 juniors? What happened to the 30 missing students?”

Here’s the explanation:

• The principal’s 500 likely includes all registered juniors, regardless of readiness, possibly even some who were sick, unfit, or hadn’t shown up yet.
• The coordinator’s 470 refers only to those who were actually fit to compete—that is, those who “drew the sword” in biblical terms.
• The 30-student gap? Those are students who were perhaps not yet qualified.

How This Relates to the Biblical Text

• In 2 Samuel 24:9, the numbers are broader, rounder, and possibly administrative or estimated—it gives 500,000 for Judah, without qualifications.
• In 1 Chronicles 21:5–6, the count is specific to men who could draw the sword, and also excludes some tribes intentionally. It gives 470,000 for Judah, and notes incompletion.

Therefore:

• The 30,000 difference is likely composed of non-combatants, unqualified individuals, or those excluded due to Joab’s halted efforts.
• The Samuel account mentions a completed count in passing but doesn’t explain the underlying reluctance or incompleteness—Chronicles gives that detail.

Moral of the Analogy

Just as a school may report total enrollment numbers while the sports coach reports only ready athletes, so Scripture may report different kinds of totals depending on the intent and audience:

• One figure is administrative and rounded (Samuel),
• The other is military-specific and cautious (Chronicles).

Understanding the purpose of each report clarifies why they are not contradictory but complementary.

Conclusion

There is no contradiction, just contextual clarity. The Bible is consistent in its testimony when the historical, linguistic, and theological factors are taken into account.

So N-O – B-I-B-L-E – C-O-N-T-R-A-D-I-C-T-I-O-N —Just Contextual Clarity.

---

If you found this post helpful, please consider sharing it on your social media platforms and in your church groups because you never know who might be encouraged or helped by the message!

We also encourage you to subscribe to our blog so you never miss an update. Here’s how:

1.  As you scroll through our page or this post, a subscription prompt may pop up — simply enter your email address.
2. Then, check your inbox and confirm your subscription to complete the process.
3.  You can also find a subscription box at the bottom of every page on our site.

It’s quick, easy, and ensures you’ll receive all our upcoming posts — filled with thoughtful insights, answers to important questions, and content designed to equip and inspire both Christians and non-Christians.

Don’t miss out on what’s coming — stay connected, stay informed, and grow with us!